George W. Bush
He is the man to spend those billions of
dollars and give them to his friends and business partners
who in turn support his political career - not least with
money.
The unknown Insider Traders
The persons or organizations who knew about
9/11 and made huge profits on the stock exchange in the days
before - and who are still not identified. Why?
Insurance Beneficiaries
On the 23rd July, 2001, just seven weeks
previous to the World Trade Center demolitions, the Port Authority
of New York and New Jersey signed a deal with a consortium
(Larry Silverstein, Westfield America Inc and Lloyd Goldman)
led by Larry Silverstein for a 99 year lease of the World
Trade Center complex.
A new insurance policy - including terrorism
for the first time - was issued for $3.6 billion.
Larry Silverstein even tried to claim $7.2
billion from the insurance because "The two hijacked
airliners that struck the 110-story twin towers Sept. 11 were
separate 'occurrences' for insurance purposes"
Barry Ostrager, a lawyer for Swiss Reinsurance
Co., the trade center's lead insurer, agreed with the Travelers
attorney that the destruction of the trade center towers was
a single event. He called causation of the towers' collapse
"a factually complex issue."
The WTC was not only a big money-loser,
it was also built using asbestos for fire-protection (!)
which was banned in the mid-1980's because it's causing cancer.
Removal of the asbestos would have cost a fortune. More in
the WTC video here.
More information about the dangers of asbestos:
For information about Mesothelioma refer to the Mesothelioma & Asbestos Awareness Center or
The Asbestos and Mesothelioma
Center - Committed to providing the latest, up-to-date
information to our visitors in hopes of creating awareness
about the dangers of asbestos.
|
US Government
The terrorist attacks gave the US government
the excuse to further pursue it's goal of "a new world
order" - NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM in latin. (also read: "world
domination", or "global hegemony") by means
of war.
The Patriot Act
now allows to spy on every citizen, may it be his phone lines,
or his online activities, by simply telling a judge the wiretapping
may lead to to information relevant to criminal investigation.
It also allows sampling of DNA of any person
convicted of "any crime of violence."
And it allows "arrest on suspicion"
- without a warrant, without "probable cause" -
in secret, without notifying anybody, without the right to
see a lawyer.
The Fourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons,
houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches
and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants
shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath
or affirmation, and particularly describing the place
to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
"I don't think the Fourth Amendment exists anymore,"
said Pyle, a professor of politics at Mount Holyoke
College, referring to the amendment that prohibits unreasonable
search and seizure and requires probable cause for a
search or arrest. "I think it's been buried by
the Patriot Act and some of the court rulings that have
been handed down. We need a requiem mass for the Fourth
Amendment, because it's gone." |
And the Patriot Act was only the beginning
- there will be more to come! (Patriot Act II, and probably
more)
|